Big Ten Conference websites: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 16 Big Ten Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 16
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Big Ten Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

F 29

Average readability score of 15 fully scanned Big Ten Conference member sites

30th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

15 of 16

Big ten conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Big Ten Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Big Ten Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 14 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Big Ten Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Big Ten Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 910
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1004

Big Ten Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Big Ten Conference: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Big Ten ConferenceA (90 to 100): 27% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 67% (10 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Big Ten Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Big Ten Conference27% (4)0% (0)67% (10)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Big Ten Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in Big Ten Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Purdue University-Main Campus

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Big Ten Conference · U.S. education rank 1

University of Iowa

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Big Ten Conference · U.S. education rank 1

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability D
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Big Ten Conference member sites

Share of the 15 fully scanned Big Ten Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level67% (10 of 15 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Big Ten Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level67%10

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Big Ten Conference members by readability score

Big Ten Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 purdue.edu
Purdue University-Main Campus U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 uiowa.edu
University of Iowa U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 unl.edu
University of Nebraska-Lincoln U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 washington.edu
University of Washington-Seattle Campus U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 northwestern.edu
Northwestern University U.S. rank 168
0 of 1 checks pass F
4 osu.edu
Ohio State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 206
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 74
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 ucla.edu
University of California-Los Angeles U.S. rank 98
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 illinois.edu
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign U.S. rank 4
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 umd.edu
University of Maryland-College Park U.S. rank 40
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 crk.umn.edu
University of Minnesota-Crookston U.S. rank 58
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 uoregon.edu
University of Oregon U.S. rank 112
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 usc.edu
University of Southern California U.S. rank 16
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin-Madison U.S. rank 56
0 of 1 checks pass F
3 msu.edu
Michigan State University U.S. rank 201
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We were able to fully scan your site. Status 200 -
umich.edu
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo