American Southwest Conference: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 5 American Southwest Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 5
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the American Southwest Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

–

No average: fewer than 5 American Southwest Conference member sites were fully scanned (4)

–

Not ranked among conferences

4 of 5

American southwest conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How American Southwest Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 4 fully scanned American Southwest Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 4 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • American Southwest Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How American Southwest Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 94
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1000

American Southwest Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. American Southwest Conference: 4 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. American Southwest ConferenceD to F (below 70): 100% (4 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
American Southwest Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
American Southwest Conference0% (0)0% (0)100% (4)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 American Southwest Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in American Southwest Conference · U.S. education rank 46

Hardin-Simmons University

F 0 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in American Southwest Conference · U.S. education rank 140

Howard Payne University

F 0 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability C
  • Readability F

#1 in American Southwest Conference · U.S. education rank 158

McMurry University

F 0 readability

  • Accessibility C
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common readability failures among American Southwest Conference member sites

Share of the 4 fully scanned American Southwest Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level100% (4 of 4 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among American Southwest Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level100%4

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

American Southwest Conference members by readability score

American Southwest Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 hsutx.edu
Hardin-Simmons University U.S. rank 46
0 of 1 checks pass F
1 hputx.edu
Howard Payne University U.S. rank 140
0 of 1 checks pass F
1 mcm.edu
McMurry University U.S. rank 158
0 of 1 checks pass F
1 schreiner.edu
Schreiner University U.S. rank 110
0 of 1 checks pass F
etbu.edu
East Texas Baptist University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo